• Categories


    • Culture
    • Design
    • Marketing
    • Podcast
    • Twitter


  • Projects


    • About
    • Contact
    • E-Mail Subscription
    • ROOM Installation
    • Art Show Down
    • MUSES Book
    • France Book
    • Love Drug


  • Tags


    advertising art Blogging brand branding Case Study CGM cloud CRM customer satisfaction Design Engagement Applications Facebook health humor identity Marketing 2.0 Mobile MySpace OpenID phtography Product Design promotion prototype psychology public relations research roadmap sales SEM SEO social media social network Social Networking strategy Sustainability touchpoints Twitter UGC user experience viral visualization web web design WordPress


  • Archives


    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008


Monthly Archives: May 2009

« Older posts

Twitter Digest

May 31, 2009 – 11:35 AM

twitterheader2

Apparently Twittering is inversely proportional to how busy I am:

  • UNDERSTAND/FIX THE WORLD
    • NY Times article about companies refreshing their logos, too bad most of them aren’t actually improved
  • MARKETING
    • TechCrunch: An interesting article about monetizing Pandora
  • DESIGN
    • A great visualization of race data by IndiStar.com
  • SOME FUN
    • A beautiful art piece with american cars that offers more than a little irony

Have a great weekend.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Twitter | Comments (0)

Highlights From The First 100 Posts

May 28, 2009 – 9:16 AM

Here’s a summary of the better blogging moments from my last (and first) 100 posts. I’ve tried to categorize them in a useful way but it may be easier to find what you’re looking for with the tag cloud.

BIG QUESTION: Is there any topic you’d like me to write about???

Resources

  • Two Strategy Tools
  • Two Elevator Pitch Exercises
  • A Positioning Map Exercise
  • A Super Simple Value Proposition Tool
  • SWOT Analysis Model For Competitive Analysis
  • A Model To Manage Loyalty Programs

Thoughts

  • What Is Marketing 2.0? … The Movie!
  • Integrating Experience Across Touchpoints
  • Brand Rot
  • Brand DNA
  • Three Steps To Brand Love
  • Experience Strategy & Experience Design
  • A Picture Of Marketing Roles & Activities
  • The Future of Marketing & Knowledge Management
  • Emergence + Crowdsourcing = Insight

Explanations

  • Managing The Social Media Mix
  • Anatomy of a Marketing Plan
  • The Creative Brief: Branding
  • Internal Vs. External Marketing
  • PR Cheat Sheet
  • The Case Study Development Process
  • Customer Satisfaction Assessment Practice
  • How Does Product Marketing Inform Service Marketing?
  • DIY Research Recruiting
  • Emergence + Crowdsourcing = Insight

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing, Podcast | Comments (0)

Blogging Lessons

May 26, 2009 – 4:04 PM

After producing 100 posts in a little over 4 months, I’m spending a week to reflect on what I’ve covered. Part of what I’ve discovered is that I’ve been closing the gap between my understanding of marketing and the understanding I can articulate. This idea is summed up beautifully by one of my role models, Ira Glass. If you’d don’t know Ira, he’s the host of This American Life. I think you’ll enjoy this clip.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Culture, Marketing | Comments (1)

Twitter Digest

May 22, 2009 – 3:30 PM

twitterheader2

The Twitterverse was relatively less viscous this week compared to last:

  • UNDERSTAND/FIX THE WORLD
    • Dear American Airlines, I’ve redisgned your website because it sucks.
    • A guided walkthrough of the WolframAlpha
  • MARKETING RELATED
    • Dan Ariely is now on TED
    • NY Times article on the Abandonment Tracker Pro
    • Ad Age: Mobile Marketing: Is ‘App-vertising’ the Answer?
    • The Deck put out a very funny “Ad Network Readership Survey”
  • SOME FUN
    • A very cool new product Bloxes
    • Ever wonder when the right time to take a pee during a movie would be?
    • Wired: High speed film is cool
    • The baby name wizard is very cool

Have a great weekend.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Twitter | Comments (1)

June 6th Art Event: ROOM Installation One Night Only – Treasure Island Warehouse Party

May 21, 2009 – 3:05 PM

As you may already know, I have a background in the arts and on June 6th I’ll be previewing an installation artwork that I created entitled ROOM. It’s a completely unique experience, and I hope you’ll come out to see it if you’re in the Bay Area. You can find more information about the project here, or you can watch the teaser video below.

If you find this video inspiring, please forward along to anyone you think might be interested in the event.

ROOM ONE NIGHT ONLY PREVIEW

WHAT: A one night only opening of the ROOM installation.

The installation will be on view, and there will be music and cordials available.

WHEN: Saturday, June 6th from 5-9 PM

WHERE: See Map Here

Getting to the warehouse is very easy. Simply take the TREASURE ISLAND Exit on the Bay Bridge. Go STRAIGHT until you come to a security booth and STOP SIGN. There’s no need to wait for a guard (there’s usually not one there). Continue STRAIGHT ahead, then take your FIRST RIGHT on CALIFORNIA AVENUE. About 50 YARDS AHEAD you’ll see a small driveway on your RIGHT that leads into a parking lot next to a large warehouse. Drive around the warehouse to the LEFT and you’ll see where to enter the warehouse. There is plenty of parking on site.

RSVP: Facebook, Upcoming, or anywhere else it’s listed!

By Roland Smart | Posted in Culture | Comments (0)

Mobile Marketing Explained

May 20, 2009 – 2:20 PM

I’ve written before about mobile marketing and how companies are beginning to find ways to integrate it into their campaigns more seamlessly and effectively. Mobile marketing is just another tool that marketing 2.0 professionals can use to reach consumers where they are, rather than making them come to the brand. That said, it’s just like any other tool in that it must provide value to customers and tie back to a clear marketing strategy. This post is really about mobile marketing 101, I’ve tried to write up an outline of what the US mobile marketing landscape looks like in plain English. As one friend suggested, you may walk away with more questions than answers after reading this, but at least they’ll be about specifics.

The Unique Experience of Mobile Marketing

The experience we have with our mobile devices is unique because of the way they fit into our lives. Unlike our computers, we’re much more attached to our mobile devices, in large part, because we spend much more time with them. We carry them with us wherever we go and emotionally identify them with the safety, connection, and personal information that they provide. They are deeply personal devices which is reinforced by the fact that we’re only supposed to get calls that are specifically intended for us (thanks do not call list!). Following this, we have a significant expectation of relevance when it comes to mobile experiences.

There is also a sense of urgency that we associate with mobile devices because we think of them as a life-line. For this reason, people tend to respond to messages on mobile devices much more quickly than through other devices. There are benefits to these associations from a marketing perspective, but there should also be increased caution because people are also more sensitive in the mobile environments.

Creating experiences that contradict our associations with mobile devices will elicit a much stronger response than in other environments. One of the best examples of this that I’ve seen is how people react to telemarketers on their cell phones versus land-lines. On the land-line people are simply irritated, but on the cell phone they take it much more personally and jump to anger (especially with the do not call list in place).

Finally, the unique value of the mobile experience is really only made possible through fully integrated campaigns that allow customers to build on the experience across brand touch-points. You can read an earlier post about integrating experience across touch-points here.

Some Quick Statistics

(gathered from E-marketer and Lyris)

  • There are over 250 million wireless mobile devices in the US.
  • By 2013 it is estimated that every American will have a wireless mobile device.
  • Mobile marketing spending is reaching to 2 billion annually.
  • Mobile marketing revenue is heading upwards of 20 billion soon.
  • Over 50% of US mobile users have participated in an SMS campaign.

3 Top Level Categories

Today mobile marketing programs can be categorized into three basic groups. Obviously, they can be combined with each other. More importantly, they can all be tied into the other marketing channels and platforms you’re using to create an integrated campaign.

  1. MOBILE MESSAGING – today, this is by far the dominant category.
    1. SMS – Short Message Service: This is a text only message of 160 characters. More than 50% of people with mobile phones today use this service and all new phones in the US market are SMS compatible. One interesting thing to know is that most people read SMS messages within 15 minutes of receiving them and respond within 60 minutes. SMS messages can also be tied together so that long messages can be spread over several 160 character messages.
    2. MMS – Multi-Media Service: Similar to SMS only this service allows for rich media content such as images, audio, and video. This has less adoption but is available on almost any phone that has a color screen (notably, except the iPhone). Here the 160 character message size also goes out the door.
    3. MIS – Mobile Instant Messaging: This is simply a service that makes your instant messaging service (Google Chat, AOL IM, ect) available on your phone. The advantage of this is that is can SMS charges depending on your service plan because the messages are sent through the phone’s data plan rather than through SMS system. Thus, you must have a web-enabled phone to use this service.
  2. MOBILE WEB – The mobile web is a service that allows users to browse the internet through their phone. Smart phones with larger screens are making the mobile web more functional along with sites that are build specifically for mobile interfaces.
    1. MOBILE APPLICATIONS – This has been the most exciting area in mobile marketing and takes advantage of custom applications that are built to run on smartphones (Apple, Blackberry, Android, ect). These applications are web-enabled so they can offer access to the mobile web along with pretty much any other mobile service.
    2. MOBILE AUDIO, VIDEO & TV -This service has the least adoption because it requires greater bandwidth than is available on most networks currently. That said there are players in the space that are trying to deliver mobile video and tv content such as Mobitv and Pandora.
  3. LOCATION/INPUT BASED
    1. QR CODES – This hasn’t really hit the us market yet, but QR (quick response) codes are essentially a 2-dimensional barcode that you can scan with a camera phone. QR codes can automatically sign up could for campaigns, make purchases, and provide information about products and services. These are already in common use in Asia.
    2. BLUETOOTH – This is a short range wireless standard that many phones currently use to connect wireless headsets to phones. Bluetooth is also capable to accepting prompts that are in close proximity to the device. It’s easy to imagine how this could be incorporated into the retail experience. This type of bluetooth application has yet to exist in the domestic market.
    3. GPS – Mobile devices can be location aware through the integration of a global positioning system. Again, location based campaigns have yet to hit the domestic market but it’s clear that integration into mobile applications hold great potential.

These categories have some use today but things are quicky integrating when it comes to mobile technology services. For example, mobile video and Video and TV is already becoming available through mobile applications. Also, the US and European markets are significantly behind Asian markets when it comes to innovation mostly due to the control that mobile service providers have exerted on device manufacturers and application developers. In Asia, mobile marketing is embedded into services in a much more sophisticate way due to the more open service environment.

SMS Components

Because SMS is by far the most popular space for mobile marketing today, I want to highlight two key components of most campaigns:

  1. SHORT CODES – A short code is basically a short telephone identification number (5+ numbers) which is tied to a phone or a brand. Thus, companies can buy a short code for their company or brands. There are three kinds of short codes:
    1. vanity – these are just like a vanity license plate on your car, so that you can purchase a code that spells out your company name or brand (good for one year).
    2. random – this is like asking for a random plate from your local DMV, it’s less expensive than a vanity code.
    3. shared/rented – if you don’t want to buy a code you can rent one from a wireless application service provider (I’ll explain these below)
  2. KEYWORDS – Keywords are words that you can type into the body of a message that you send to a short code. These allow companies to parse the messages they are receiving as relevant to specific campaigns or topics.

When short codes and keywords are combined it’s possible to create fairly involved interactions through an SMS-enabled phone. For example, Starbucks ran a short code as part of an integrated campaign that offered a free cup of coffee to anyone that sent an SMS to the number with a specific keyword which might have been “freebie” or “bonuscup” or something like that. After they opted-in through this campaign, Starbucks could send them campaigns on an ongoing basis (or until they opt-out).

Opt-In

SMS interactions do require an opt-in just like e-mail campaigns, though they are not managed under CAN-SPAM. Instead they are enforced by the service carriers. Unfortunately, the carriers do not have a uniform policy so rules and consequences vary by carrier. There is a movement to unify this policy underway.

It’s important to understand that you can’t buy mobile lists, you have to build them. There are some tactics to get people to opt-in for SMS service that have strong parity with the types of incentives that work in the e-mail messaging space. For example, running competitions and sweepstakes has been a popular approach. The most successful approach, however, is to provide real value to customers through SMS programs.

The Mobile Marketing Players

Every mobile marketing campaign includes a variety of players. I’ll take the case of SMS first:

  • THE BRAND – This is the company that wants to run the campaign.
  • WIRELESS APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS (WASP) – These are companies that help brands create and manage campaigns with various levels of service. They can rent you a shared short code and provide turnkey negotiation with the carriers and aggregators.
  • AGGREGATORS – These companies are the primary liaison between the carriers and companies.
  • WIRELESS CARRIERS – These are the companies that provide the wireless service to phones (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, etc)

It is possible for brands to work directly with the aggregators and cut out the wasps, but typically this would only make sense if you have a significant amount of mobile marketing business and extensive experience in the space.

In the case of mobile applications, the wasps are replaced by partners such as Nokia, Palm, and Blackberry. And there’s Apple which allows companies to make application available through their iTunes Store and iPhones. Their store is unique because it is the largest single vendor of mobile applications and because they operate as a gatekeeper that requires application approval. In this regard, they use a similar model to the wireless service providers that require approval of SMS campaigns. If applications are sold, they take a cut of that transaction. There are other players in the market that are less rigid than Apple, including Nokia which allows users to download third party applications freely. Nokia is also getting ready to open an application store of thier own as an extension of their OVI platform.

A Word About Mobile Financial Transactions

Unlike in the US, mobile users in Asia are able to make purchases with their phones. And, I’m not just talking about online purchases,which we can do in the US market, but about purchases in a retail context. For example,  they can use their cell phones to buy a can of soda from a soda vending machine. When they do this the charge typically shows up on the credit section of their mobile bill, which represents phone companies getting into the credit business.

Ideally, our phones should allow up to make purchases not just to our phone bills but also to our credit cards as well, which would save us the trouble of lugging around fat wallets full of plastic. The wireless services providers are partly to blame for slowing innovation in the US, but I’m sure that the credit companies haven’t been helping out either. You could imagine that they’re not super keen to competing with additional credit companies.

Apparently there are plans under way at several large mobile companies to try and get financial transactions happening on phones in the US. I’m not holding my breath, but it’s clear that when this issue gets resolved it will significantly impact the mobile marketing landscape.

The Cost of Mobile Marketing

The cost of mobile marketing campaigns will vary greatly depending on the type of campaign you’re running. In the case of an SMS campaign, there will be the set up fee for the short code and then you’ll pay by the message. There will also be fees from the wasps and aggregators, but the most significant expense will come from the service providers who make money on a transactional basis for sending SMS messages. Obviously, if you’re using coupons or some other promotion, you’ll have to account for the value of the product discounts you’ll be giving away.

If you’re looking at creating an application, the up front costs are in the development of the application because the partners get paid based on a percentage of sales costs. There may also be some minimal set up fees to get your application up and running through the partner commerce site.

Some Popular SMS Programs

Here’s a quick list of popular ways companies are using SMS today:

  • Competitions – text to win
  • Events Reminders – increase event attendance/conversion, special vip rewards
  • Coupons – provide promotions/incentives
  • Activity/Service Alerts – transactional information, reminders, etc
  • Surveys/Polls/Voting – market research, entertainment
  • Trivia Games – entertainment, information serving
  • Question & Answer – information serving
  • Transcription – value added services

Popular Integration Opportunities

Here are some popular places that companies embed short codes and keywords.

  • Billboards
  • On packaging
  • Online communications (e-mail, blogs, viral video, etc)
  • Traditional media placement
  • In store
  • Customer service interaction

Thanks for reading, and let me know if I missed any basic elements! For those interested in learning more, check out The Mobile Marketing Association’s best practices guidlines here.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Tagged Mobile | Comments (1)

An Annotated Wireframe Sketch: The Future E-Mail

May 19, 2009 – 7:43 AM

I recently had a few conversations with the folks over at the Alliance for Climate Education in Oakland, CA regarding their plans to develop community of students engaged with climate change. Part of our discussion explored what an e-mail communication might look like to follow up on their presentations. In this post, I’ll share one the sketches I made and why sketched annotated wireframe sketches are helpful.

About The Alliance For Climate Education

The Alliance for Climate Education trains educators to go into schools and present the latest information of climate change. Think of it as bringing an Al Gore disciple into your school who knows all about what’s going on in your local community. One question is how to keep the relationships that these presenters form with the students going after the presentation is over.

The Challenge

As a young organization they’re still figuring out what needs students and teachers have and how they can provide a relevant service on an ongoing basis. Thus, the follow up e-mail exploration was used as an exercise to open up the opportunity space and explore possible post-presentation interactions in support of relationship development.

The Future E-mail Exercise

The stated goal of the e-mail campaign was to drive ongoing engagement with students. Following this, I starting thinking about how to transition the relationship with the presenter to someone in the student’s everyday life. In this case, that was a teacher at the school and/or the student’s parents. I also wanted to provide value for the students, so I included information about scholarships, local events, and photos from the presentation at the school. Here’s what the sketch looks like, you can click on it to see a larger version:

campaign wire-frame

Ideally, sketches like these would be done by a cross-functional team and shared in a workshop setting. Quick sketches are a great way to quickly generate ideas, or even flush out concepts. You don’t have to be able to draw like a pro either, simple stick figures and boxes will do just fine. The lightweight nature of sketches also prevents sidetracking conversations about color, wording, and other details that are better suited to high-fidelity wireframes that are done later in the development process.

Results

The result of this kind of exercise is a collection of sketches that contain a set of ideas which can be collected and analyzed in support of strategy development and tactical implementation. In this case, my sketch started a series of conversations about the community that the organization was attempting to serve. My perspective was that there are already many organizations attempting to serve students directly and that the real opportunity space was to create tools for teachers, and student leaders, to organize students to engage in local projects. Based on this approach, the Alliance for Climate Change might explore providing tools to teachers such as e-mail templates, website templates, training, etc. It’ll be interesting to see which direction they end up taking.

In the meantime, if you’re interested in learning more about wireframes, here’s a link to a great post by James Kelway entitled The what, when and why of wireframes.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Comments (0)

The Ideas Project

May 18, 2009 – 8:27 AM

Ideas Project

The Ideas Project is a wonderful site that I’ve been reading for several months. They feature short interviews, with technology and communication thought leaders, that are intended to sum up their big idea. The site has been an inspiration for my own work, which is why I’m thrilled to share that I’m being featured on the site this week!

I’m really humbled to be part of a community of thought leaders who I’ve been looking up to and following for a long time. Compared to these folks, I feel like I’m just getting started. I hope you’ll visit the site and get as inspired as I have been.

Here’s part of  the interview I did, check out the site for more:

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Comments (1)

Twitter Digest

May 15, 2009 – 3:18 PM

twitterheader2

As you can see, it’s been a productive week in the Twitterverse.
Also, THIS IS MY 100th BLOG POST since starting this blog. Big thanks to everyone who’s been following my writing, sending me links to interesting stuff, and forwarding my posts to others. And now, back to our regular scheduled program:

  • UNDERSTAND/FIX THE WORLD
    • US National Design Policy Initiative and here’s my video submission.
    • Another submission from the articulate Tim Leberecht.
    • The new NY Times reader makes things easier.
    • NY Times: Searching for Value in Ludicrous Ideas
  • MARKETING RELATED
    • AD AGE: Mobile Marketing: Is ‘App-vertising’ the Answer?
    • Tech Crunch: A very interesting look at the future of search
    • Nielsen’s Online Global Landscape Report
    • Yet another entry in the word of mouth services industry – SocialMedia.com (nice name)
    • Seth Godin talks at TED
    • Tim Leberecht reports on The Next09 Conference
    • Harvard Business: How Artist/Leaders Do Things Differently
    • Silicon Valley Insider: Why YouTube may be doomed.
  • SOME FUN
    • NY Times: A Digital Field Guides Eliminate the Guesswork an iPhone app that identifies leaves!
    • Meat based business cards, I want some!

Have a great weekend.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Twitter | Comments (0)

How Do Market Positions Relate To Competitive Advantage Positions?

May 14, 2009 – 10:13 AM

In my previous blog post about competitive advantage, I talked about Michael Porter’s model outlining three basic advantage positions, here I want to briefly explain how this conception relates to market position. In the past, when I’ve written about positioning, I’ve focused on understanding how companies relate to each other with respect to product strategy. In this case, I’m more interested in overall marketing strategy.

Four Market Positions

There are four basic market positions which include:

  • MARKET LEADER- Market leaders tends to have the greatest market share and produce mass market products and services at the lowest cost with the greatest distribution and the most promotion.
  • MARKET CHALLENGER – Market challengers are focused on becoming market leaders by competing in the key areas that define the leader, such as price, efficiency, mass market distribution, etc. One advantage to being a challenger is that it’s possible to benefit from mistakes that the market leader makes as well as from the new markets that the market leader invests in creating.
  • MARKET FOLLOWER – Not all companies want to challenge the market leaders, or get into the price wars that can leave challengers is bad shape. It takes a great deal of energy for challengers to fight their way to the top and for leaders to fend off challengers. Meanwhile, followers are happy to sit on the sidelines and conduct highly profitable businesses that learn from the leaders and challengers without any of the upfront research and development costs. They can copy what works at relatively low cost and thus focus more energy on customer service.
  • MARKET NICHER – Market Nichers have no intention of serving the mass market like the other positions, they are interested in serving segments withing the overall market. Part of what makes nicher’s profitable is that they can serve customer needs much better through the development of segment specific products and services that offer more value than their mass market counterparts.

Positions & Competitive Advantage

Competitive advantages and market positions are tied together because each position is only compatible with one or two of the basic advantage positions (see my post on the three advantage positions “cost leadership”, “differentiation”, and “focus”). For example, leaders are well positioned to take a cost leadership role, as are challengers. Though challengers can also pursue differentiation effectively. Followers usually adopt differentiation, though they could pursue a focus approach. Finally, nichers seem most likely to choose a focus or differentiation strategy.

Things get a little more complicated when trying to adjust for the fact that companies occasionally change their market position, which means thay may have to transition from one advantage base to another. Using this framework can help make sense of how companies fit into a competitive landscape, and how to direct investments to support an overall marketing strategy.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Comments (0)
« Older posts
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.8)