Apparently Twittering is inversely proportional to how busy I am:
- UNDERSTAND/FIX THE WORLD
- MARKETING
- DESIGN
- A great visualization of race data by IndiStar.com
- SOME FUN
Apparently Twittering is inversely proportional to how busy I am:
Here’s a summary of the better blogging moments from my last (and first) 100 posts. I’ve tried to categorize them in a useful way but it may be easier to find what you’re looking for with the tag cloud.
BIG QUESTION: Is there any topic you’d like me to write about???
Resources
Thoughts
Explanations
After producing 100 posts in a little over 4 months, I’m spending a week to reflect on what I’ve covered. Part of what I’ve discovered is that I’ve been closing the gap between my understanding of marketing and the understanding I can articulate. This idea is summed up beautifully by one of my role models, Ira Glass. If you’d don’t know Ira, he’s the host of This American Life. I think you’ll enjoy this clip.
The Twitterverse was relatively less viscous this week compared to last:
As you may already know, I have a background in the arts and on June 6th I’ll be previewing an installation artwork that I created entitled ROOM. It’s a completely unique experience, and I hope you’ll come out to see it if you’re in the Bay Area. You can find more information about the project here, or you can watch the teaser video below.
If you find this video inspiring, please forward along to anyone you think might be interested in the event.
The installation will be on view, and there will be music and cordials available.
Getting to the warehouse is very easy. Simply take the TREASURE ISLAND Exit on the Bay Bridge. Go STRAIGHT until you come to a security booth and STOP SIGN. There’s no need to wait for a guard (there’s usually not one there). Continue STRAIGHT ahead, then take your FIRST RIGHT on CALIFORNIA AVENUE. About 50 YARDS AHEAD you’ll see a small driveway on your RIGHT that leads into a parking lot next to a large warehouse. Drive around the warehouse to the LEFT and you’ll see where to enter the warehouse. There is plenty of parking on site.
I’ve written before about mobile marketing and how companies are beginning to find ways to integrate it into their campaigns more seamlessly and effectively. Mobile marketing is just another tool that marketing 2.0 professionals can use to reach consumers where they are, rather than making them come to the brand. That said, it’s just like any other tool in that it must provide value to customers and tie back to a clear marketing strategy. This post is really about mobile marketing 101, I’ve tried to write up an outline of what the US mobile marketing landscape looks like in plain English. As one friend suggested, you may walk away with more questions than answers after reading this, but at least they’ll be about specifics.
The experience we have with our mobile devices is unique because of the way they fit into our lives. Unlike our computers, we’re much more attached to our mobile devices, in large part, because we spend much more time with them. We carry them with us wherever we go and emotionally identify them with the safety, connection, and personal information that they provide. They are deeply personal devices which is reinforced by the fact that we’re only supposed to get calls that are specifically intended for us (thanks do not call list!). Following this, we have a significant expectation of relevance when it comes to mobile experiences.
There is also a sense of urgency that we associate with mobile devices because we think of them as a life-line. For this reason, people tend to respond to messages on mobile devices much more quickly than through other devices. There are benefits to these associations from a marketing perspective, but there should also be increased caution because people are also more sensitive in the mobile environments.
Creating experiences that contradict our associations with mobile devices will elicit a much stronger response than in other environments. One of the best examples of this that I’ve seen is how people react to telemarketers on their cell phones versus land-lines. On the land-line people are simply irritated, but on the cell phone they take it much more personally and jump to anger (especially with the do not call list in place).
Finally, the unique value of the mobile experience is really only made possible through fully integrated campaigns that allow customers to build on the experience across brand touch-points. You can read an earlier post about integrating experience across touch-points here.
(gathered from E-marketer and Lyris)
Today mobile marketing programs can be categorized into three basic groups. Obviously, they can be combined with each other. More importantly, they can all be tied into the other marketing channels and platforms you’re using to create an integrated campaign.
These categories have some use today but things are quicky integrating when it comes to mobile technology services. For example, mobile video and Video and TV is already becoming available through mobile applications. Also, the US and European markets are significantly behind Asian markets when it comes to innovation mostly due to the control that mobile service providers have exerted on device manufacturers and application developers. In Asia, mobile marketing is embedded into services in a much more sophisticate way due to the more open service environment.
Because SMS is by far the most popular space for mobile marketing today, I want to highlight two key components of most campaigns:
When short codes and keywords are combined it’s possible to create fairly involved interactions through an SMS-enabled phone. For example, Starbucks ran a short code as part of an integrated campaign that offered a free cup of coffee to anyone that sent an SMS to the number with a specific keyword which might have been “freebie” or “bonuscup” or something like that. After they opted-in through this campaign, Starbucks could send them campaigns on an ongoing basis (or until they opt-out).
SMS interactions do require an opt-in just like e-mail campaigns, though they are not managed under CAN-SPAM. Instead they are enforced by the service carriers. Unfortunately, the carriers do not have a uniform policy so rules and consequences vary by carrier. There is a movement to unify this policy underway.
It’s important to understand that you can’t buy mobile lists, you have to build them. There are some tactics to get people to opt-in for SMS service that have strong parity with the types of incentives that work in the e-mail messaging space. For example, running competitions and sweepstakes has been a popular approach. The most successful approach, however, is to provide real value to customers through SMS programs.
Every mobile marketing campaign includes a variety of players. I’ll take the case of SMS first:
It is possible for brands to work directly with the aggregators and cut out the wasps, but typically this would only make sense if you have a significant amount of mobile marketing business and extensive experience in the space.
In the case of mobile applications, the wasps are replaced by partners such as Nokia, Palm, and Blackberry. And there’s Apple which allows companies to make application available through their iTunes Store and iPhones. Their store is unique because it is the largest single vendor of mobile applications and because they operate as a gatekeeper that requires application approval. In this regard, they use a similar model to the wireless service providers that require approval of SMS campaigns. If applications are sold, they take a cut of that transaction. There are other players in the market that are less rigid than Apple, including Nokia which allows users to download third party applications freely. Nokia is also getting ready to open an application store of thier own as an extension of their OVI platform.
Unlike in the US, mobile users in Asia are able to make purchases with their phones. And, I’m not just talking about online purchases,which we can do in the US market, but about purchases in a retail context. For example, they can use their cell phones to buy a can of soda from a soda vending machine. When they do this the charge typically shows up on the credit section of their mobile bill, which represents phone companies getting into the credit business.
Ideally, our phones should allow up to make purchases not just to our phone bills but also to our credit cards as well, which would save us the trouble of lugging around fat wallets full of plastic. The wireless services providers are partly to blame for slowing innovation in the US, but I’m sure that the credit companies haven’t been helping out either. You could imagine that they’re not super keen to competing with additional credit companies.
Apparently there are plans under way at several large mobile companies to try and get financial transactions happening on phones in the US. I’m not holding my breath, but it’s clear that when this issue gets resolved it will significantly impact the mobile marketing landscape.
The cost of mobile marketing campaigns will vary greatly depending on the type of campaign you’re running. In the case of an SMS campaign, there will be the set up fee for the short code and then you’ll pay by the message. There will also be fees from the wasps and aggregators, but the most significant expense will come from the service providers who make money on a transactional basis for sending SMS messages. Obviously, if you’re using coupons or some other promotion, you’ll have to account for the value of the product discounts you’ll be giving away.
If you’re looking at creating an application, the up front costs are in the development of the application because the partners get paid based on a percentage of sales costs. There may also be some minimal set up fees to get your application up and running through the partner commerce site.
Here’s a quick list of popular ways companies are using SMS today:
Here are some popular places that companies embed short codes and keywords.
Thanks for reading, and let me know if I missed any basic elements! For those interested in learning more, check out The Mobile Marketing Association’s best practices guidlines here.
I recently had a few conversations with the folks over at the Alliance for Climate Education in Oakland, CA regarding their plans to develop community of students engaged with climate change. Part of our discussion explored what an e-mail communication might look like to follow up on their presentations. In this post, I’ll share one the sketches I made and why sketched annotated wireframe sketches are helpful.
The Alliance for Climate Education trains educators to go into schools and present the latest information of climate change. Think of it as bringing an Al Gore disciple into your school who knows all about what’s going on in your local community. One question is how to keep the relationships that these presenters form with the students going after the presentation is over.
As a young organization they’re still figuring out what needs students and teachers have and how they can provide a relevant service on an ongoing basis. Thus, the follow up e-mail exploration was used as an exercise to open up the opportunity space and explore possible post-presentation interactions in support of relationship development.
The stated goal of the e-mail campaign was to drive ongoing engagement with students. Following this, I starting thinking about how to transition the relationship with the presenter to someone in the student’s everyday life. In this case, that was a teacher at the school and/or the student’s parents. I also wanted to provide value for the students, so I included information about scholarships, local events, and photos from the presentation at the school. Here’s what the sketch looks like, you can click on it to see a larger version:
Ideally, sketches like these would be done by a cross-functional team and shared in a workshop setting. Quick sketches are a great way to quickly generate ideas, or even flush out concepts. You don’t have to be able to draw like a pro either, simple stick figures and boxes will do just fine. The lightweight nature of sketches also prevents sidetracking conversations about color, wording, and other details that are better suited to high-fidelity wireframes that are done later in the development process.
The result of this kind of exercise is a collection of sketches that contain a set of ideas which can be collected and analyzed in support of strategy development and tactical implementation. In this case, my sketch started a series of conversations about the community that the organization was attempting to serve. My perspective was that there are already many organizations attempting to serve students directly and that the real opportunity space was to create tools for teachers, and student leaders, to organize students to engage in local projects. Based on this approach, the Alliance for Climate Change might explore providing tools to teachers such as e-mail templates, website templates, training, etc. It’ll be interesting to see which direction they end up taking.
In the meantime, if you’re interested in learning more about wireframes, here’s a link to a great post by James Kelway entitled The what, when and why of wireframes.
The Ideas Project is a wonderful site that I’ve been reading for several months. They feature short interviews, with technology and communication thought leaders, that are intended to sum up their big idea. The site has been an inspiration for my own work, which is why I’m thrilled to share that I’m being featured on the site this week!
I’m really humbled to be part of a community of thought leaders who I’ve been looking up to and following for a long time. Compared to these folks, I feel like I’m just getting started. I hope you’ll visit the site and get as inspired as I have been.
Here’s part of the interview I did, check out the site for more:
As you can see, it’s been a productive week in the Twitterverse.
Also, THIS IS MY 100th BLOG POST since starting this blog. Big thanks to everyone who’s been following my writing, sending me links to interesting stuff, and forwarding my posts to others. And now, back to our regular scheduled program:
In my previous blog post about competitive advantage, I talked about Michael Porter’s model outlining three basic advantage positions, here I want to briefly explain how this conception relates to market position. In the past, when I’ve written about positioning, I’ve focused on understanding how companies relate to each other with respect to product strategy. In this case, I’m more interested in overall marketing strategy.
There are four basic market positions which include:
Competitive advantages and market positions are tied together because each position is only compatible with one or two of the basic advantage positions (see my post on the three advantage positions “cost leadership”, “differentiation”, and “focus”). For example, leaders are well positioned to take a cost leadership role, as are challengers. Though challengers can also pursue differentiation effectively. Followers usually adopt differentiation, though they could pursue a focus approach. Finally, nichers seem most likely to choose a focus or differentiation strategy.
Things get a little more complicated when trying to adjust for the fact that companies occasionally change their market position, which means thay may have to transition from one advantage base to another. Using this framework can help make sense of how companies fit into a competitive landscape, and how to direct investments to support an overall marketing strategy.