• Categories


    • Culture
    • Design
    • Marketing
    • Podcast
    • Twitter


  • Projects


    • About
    • Contact
    • E-Mail Subscription
    • ROOM Installation
    • Art Show Down
    • MUSES Book
    • France Book
    • Love Drug


  • Tags


    advertising art Blogging brand branding Case Study CGM cloud CRM customer satisfaction Design Engagement Applications Facebook health humor identity Marketing 2.0 Mobile MySpace OpenID phtography Product Design promotion prototype psychology public relations research roadmap sales SEM SEO social media social network Social Networking strategy Sustainability touchpoints Twitter UGC user experience viral visualization web web design WordPress


  • Archives


    • August 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008


Monthly Archives: February 2009

« Older posts
Newer posts »

Twitter Digest

February 13, 2009 – 12:00 PM

twitterheader2

Here’s the weekly twitter summary, and if you’d like to follow me on Twitter you can do so at: http://twitter.com/rsmartx.

  • Demetri Martin is my kind of comedian, here’s a great video.
  • Tynt, a new application that let’s you get analytics from anything copied & pasted off your website.
  • Is Tynt Tracer a Boon for Bloggers? – More on Tynt …. and I’m quoted in this article!
  • What’s the Value of a Big Bonus? – Dan Ariely’s research into executive compensation: NY Times Op-Ed.
  • Becoming a Customer Experience-Driven Business – Peter Merholz on the Harvard Business Blog
  • Google launches Friend Connect, thus making the web more social.

Have a great weekend.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Twitter | Comments (0)

The Value of UGC

February 12, 2009 – 4:59 PM

As web 2.0 hits full stride and mashup ventures attempt to extract additional value from Web 1.0 properties, there has been much talk about how user generated content (UGC) fits in. With the heightened pressure of an economic crisis, UGCX programmed panels on monetizing user generated content through communities and mashups. it’s clear that many consumers are currently willing to produce  content without compensation, and in most cases without the hope of future compensation. It’s less clear if/when this content has value. And, if/when it does, how do we extract it?

Some Context

Let’s look at mashups first, they are taking a cut of existing business by adding efficiency and turning up new business opportunities. They add efficiency by supporting relevant/targeted marketing opportunities, subscription, lead generation, etc … while driving down costs through improved conversion rates. On the other hand, the value of UGC seems balanced between direct revenue and the possibility of increased competitiveness. In the first case, communities can sell their content through an online marketplace. In the second, they can be leveraged to promote products and services while offering significant input to the product/service development process, which ultimately leads to more competitive products.

How It Might Play Itself Out

With this in mind, imagine a future web experience that would allow you to take your social networks wherever you go. This shouldn’t be to hard considering the recent announcement by Google about Friend Connect. So now, as you look for a movie on Netflix, you can review not only aggregate Netflix data, but also data from your friend-set. It gets even more interesting though when you have a mashup that helps you understand how your community differs from others. This information should have some value for you, and has obvious value for marketers. Perhaps there is a social pact that underlies consumer generated media, which states that companies must use this information do deliver more relevant marketing and better products and services?

I suppose, companies that don’t use it will simply be less competitive when it comes to the experiences they offer. That said, I do see a potential problem with UGC networks. Part of what would allow such a system to work is it’s ability to relate your desires with those of your friend-set on multiple dimensions. It assumes that you’ll be interested in the films that your friends are interested in, and that there are relevant similarities and differences in your preferences. Perhaps this is possible, but I’m not so sure that pulling patterns out of my friend-set will be more relevant than aggregate market data based on transaction history. I’d love to see some data on preference similarities among friends. Intuitively, I would imagine there are shared values but then I also wonder what role geography plays? Perhaps the answers will come out of web 2.0 ventures.

If you follow this thread, I sense that it eventually leads back to a question about how consumer generated media will relate to professional journalism? Even if there are preference similarities in my community, I’m still not sure I would trust them over a professional journalist whose reputation rests on his/her research and integrity. I wonder if we’re not experiencing a pendulum swing towards the production of UGC, which will continue until the next wave of monetization models play themselves out?

The world of UGC is still the wild west, and I don’t think consumers have really established what return they want from their UGC investment. For some it’s simply recognition, for others it’s making a buck. Until we have more experience working with this content, and understanding all the dimensions of it’s value, I suspect that consumers will continue producing with abandon. I predict a point, however, at which the pendulum will stop swinging in it’s current direction and the market will demand greater reliability and quality. In a growing stream of UGC there is a need to establish credibility that hasn’t been figured out yet. I don’t think that the friend-set proposition resolves this UGC challenge, though I could see it as a component of a solution. I’m concerned that communities will foster the viral transmission of ideas because they will be relying on each others recommendations without anyone conducting an in-depth analysis. And, if someone did do the work, how would you distinguish it from everything else?

The Value In UGC

  • Democratizes sharing of information
  • Distributes content efficiently
  • Fosters dialogue and diverse perspectives
  • Enables crowd-sourcing and problem solving
  • Provides large data-sets for analysis

Another thing that will probably play out is an understanding of where having our community really makes a difference. Considering what kinds of value are held within UGC is obviously the issue here. For consumers, extracting value may require being open to marketing messages based on your community. For marketers extracting value may mean providing the community with tools to foster social engagement and enable more relevant marketing. In other words, consumers will continue generating content if companies are able to demonstrate that it will improve their products and services in a tangible way.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Tagged CGM, UGC | Comments (1)

The Future of Marketing & Knowledge Management

February 11, 2009 – 9:53 AM

In the past weeks, I’ve been writing about where marketing has been, and where it is today. This post is focused on where marketing needs to go from here.

Before I start in, you might want to skim my previous posts on the state of marketing today: Visualizing How Marketers Got Here, Where Marketers Are Today and Internal vs. External Marketing.

The thrust of this post is that marketers will be more and more focused on knowledge management in the future. We already know that companies are tightening their belts, and that marketers are under increasing pressure to demonstrate ROI. I propose that the shift to knowledge management is an excellent means of addressing these pressures.

I’m gonna cite some research from SiriusDecisions below that will help support my argument.

Why Knowledge Management?

70% of companies that participated in the recent research study said that their sales growth strategy for this year will be focused on optimizing the sales process. How are they going to do that? One way is to increase efficiency by allowing sales people to focus on having conversations, rather than digging up the materials they need to support the new relationships they are building. This is the area in which marketing, and knowledge management, can help.

question

Just for the record, sales is really hard. You’ve got to have a deep understanding of your products and services, keep track of many relationships, understand market trends, and withstand a significant amount of pressure to close deals. Plus, many departments are constantly trying to interface directly with salespeople, which can lead to an overwhelming number of mixed messages. In response to this, salespeople often insulate themselves by selling the products that they are most comfortable with, which is not necessarily good for the company or consistent with the larger business strategy. I sincerely feel for sales people, and I see a significant part of marketing as empathizing with sales people (they are customers of marketing), and trying to provide them with products and services that meet their needs and make their lives better.

Let’s return to efficiency for a moment, and I want to include a link to my previous post about customer relationship management tools (CRM) , where I compare several CRM vendors, because they can be a big help here. The good news is that CRM tools are getting better, easier to use, and can have a huge impact on productivity. I want to specifically talk about the knowledge management functions of the CRM, the best one I’ve found is SalesForce Content, but such tools are also available with different feature mixes from SAVO, SugarCRM, NetSuite, and the other’s mentioned in my CRM post. With these tools it is possible to manage all your assets (case studies, testimonials, collateral, pricing, press coverage, etc) where the salesperson maintains a record of his/her client communications.  SalesForce Content, goes even further by making it possible to tag those assets, rank them, and view the history of revisions.

As some background, 82% of executives in the study stated that the sales reps they spoke with were not prepared enough for their meetings. Knowledge management is one way to make the necessary preparations quicker because your sales team can have all the relevant assets in one place. This should start to address the data showing that 50% – 80% of marketing content is not used by sales people. But, it’s not just about making the content accessible, it’s about putting it in context, and improving it’s quality. On the context front,  CRM systems can already capture all e-mail communications with potential clients so salesperson will know if the prospect ever contacted the company before, if they’ve read the company newsletter, and even and what they clicked on. People in the CRM biz call this a 360º view, and it makes taking over accounts, or transitioning them, much easier as well.

happy

So it’s clear that this can improve efficiency through accessibility and context, but it’s also possible to improve the quality of the information through the ranking and revisioning functions. This functionality allows the marketing manager to work as a moderator, take responsibility for tracking the latest updates to the archive, and add value. This is a second means of addressing the low rate of content use. Knowledge management is less about creating content and more about taking to collective knowledge of the organization and preparing it as a resource for the organization. Following this, the research shows a shift away from content creation and towards content management. I suspect that this data also accounts for greater attention being given to online communications and digital collateral, which is more quickly revised and distributed. Here’s are the high level takeaways:

  • More moderation (less content creation)
  • More attention directed at identification of gaps and opportunities
  • Greater distribution of knowledge
  • More, and distributed, knowledge inputs
  • Improved harvesting of best practices & insights
  • knowledge is more accessible

What The Cost and ROI?

Knowledge management isn’t just about solving a content problem, it’s solving a conversation problem. So how do we know if it’s working? One way is by tracking the use of content that’s in the system. With SalesForce Content, it should be possible to correlate conversion to the assets used in the sales process. With the 360º view of clients, it is also possible to qualify clients more efficiently though improved sales process reporting (i.e. average sales cycle, deal size, etc). Finally, the CRM makes it possible to understand the engagement level of salespeople to measure their performance and the value of the system itself.

graph

Simply put, knowledge management allows salespeople to be smarter. Plus, it distributes work that was once done by marketing staff to the people who interact with the customers most and understand their immediate needs. This helps offset the resources that marketers will invest in knowledge management practice. Finally, knowledge management allows for a more agile approach to the development of marketing resources, because it allows salespeople, and others, to participate in the process.

What kinds of knowledge are we talking about?

Here’s a sample of the kinds of things that you might find in a knowledge management system.

  • Competitive Intelligence
    • updated market trends reports
    • updated selling point documentation (unique value propositions)
    • a competitive landscape matrix
    • the most common impediments to conversion and interventions
  • By Sales Stage
    • Prospecting
      • sales scripts
      • contact templates
    • Qualification
      • conversion trends based on CRM data
      • touchpoint data (newsletters, e-mail, etc)
    • Discovery
      • discovery quide
      • capabilities documentation
      • assessment letter
      • methods & practices library
      • anecdote library
    • Proposal
      • presentation templates
      • case studies
      • testamonials
      • press
      • PR
      • biographical information
    • Close
      • legal assets
      • statement of work documentation
      • pricing guidelines

Thanks for reading, and I look forward to any thoughts, comments, or feedback!

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Tagged CGM, UGC | Comments (3)

User Generated Content Expo Report Day 2

February 10, 2009 – 4:31 PM

Day two at the UGCX. There are four tracks at the expo including Social Content, Photography, Music, Videos and Gaming. Again, I’ll be focused on the first track but will be checking in on the others for specific speakers. Here’s a quick play-by-play of what I saw today.

  • Keynote: Guy Kawasaki, Founding Partner Garage Technology Ventures. A conversation with Guy got the day rolling. The first question was about Guy’s Alltop project (tag line: aggregation without aggravation), a better news aggregator? My current aggregator doesn’t aggravate me, but I’ll check it out later. According to Guy this site fits into his ongoing project “to prove that you can generate a million dollars a year working from home and managing a website with a couple of people” (think Hot of Not). It’s really more than that though, and I think his comment was really more about his previous project Truemors. The latter is a simple CGM based business that requires little maintenance, and which was set up inexpensively. Here are some of the other things he touched on.
    • The secret to gaining audience and how to market your services? “Good stuff.” Give people great services and the rest will come. Guy’s two theories of marketing: 1) “the bullshit option” – look for marketing leaders and suck up to them 2) “nobody is the next somebody” – spread out your message to the masses to find the next big evangelist. Guy obviously prefers the latter. It’s not a trickle down thing, marketing is about finding water underground … marketers should be drilling lots of holes.
    • Next question, what are VC’s looking at these days? Most see no IPOs in the short term, and no liquidity. Plus, ad models are breaking. Meanwhile, the rules that govern asset allocation are throwing off fund balances, which is going to take some time to correct (updated valuations). In the meantime, you can get an office, furniture, and good labor on the cheap to get your next business off the ground. For 25K-50K you can do some serious damage. Don’t worry about what the VCs are doing, just get started on your project with less money.
    • A company to check out: Tynt. This service embeds code into your page so that when people copy and paste stuff you’ll be able to track it … and your watermark will allows readers to find the original source. Good idea.
  • What’s Next for Social Content? Moderator: Andrew Warner, Founder, Mixergy.com Speakers: Rachel Masters, Vice President of Strategic Relationships, Ning, Oren Michels, CEO, Mashery, Blake Cahill, Senior VP of Sales and Marketing, Visible Technologies, Richard Jalichandra, President and CEO, Technorati
    • Measuring sentiment in CGM is one of the biggest challenges for the next generation of platforms and technologies. Though, according to Blake, 70% of CGM does not actually include good sentiment data.
    • Same message over and over again: listen to your community and foster dialogue.
    • Oren game a quick primer on APIs, which basically allow companies to make their back-end data available to partners. Think of it as adding lego connectors to your data. This allows millions of Twitter mashups to proliferate.
    • Rachel talked about the WD40 community on Ning …. you do have to wonder how deep that community can really go? It also makes me wonder if there will be an era of consolidation in the future, maybe a group of lubricant groups? How can we embed communities in communities? Which is the REAL lubricants community?
    • Richard talks about the importance of reading other people blogs, and commenting on them, as part of the process of building community for your own blog. In the keynote Guy said that he friends anyone who friends him on Twitter because he sees this as a gesture of respect, and because it allows him to direct message with anyone he meets.
    • A mention of an interesting Technorati feature that allows their users to adopt a common tag and define it (a la Wikipedia).
  • The Last Hurrah: Monetizing Groups? Moderator: Nate Brochin, CEO, Groupable Speakers:  Justin Ramers, Director of Social Media, The Active Network, Laura Fortner, SVP, Marketing & Insights, CafeMom, Ryan Hupfer, Communicator of Awesomeness!, HubPages, Adryenn Ashley, Chief Idea Bunny, Wow! Is Me
    • “Self-organized grassroots communities seem like the perfect micro-target for marketers, but it seems that effective business models haven’t been developed to access these communities.” Hmmm, this sounds like a very traditional approach. I’d say try participating in the groups, adding value, and building trust. Then ask them nicely for their thoughts about your stuff.
    • Ryan from HubPages said something interesting, apparently they look at Google Search and find gaps that are not being served by adwords. I’m not sure how you would do this but he said, “if you’re interested in coffee, there might be an under-served search for Venezuela Coffee. We find those gaps and help you monetize them.”
    • Adryeen seems to be focused on connecting communities with relevant brands/sponsors. The group gets a deal, the brand gets potential customers. I wonder if a third party can really do this well. It seems that companies need to learn how to do this themselves.
  • Keynote: Fred Durham CEO and Founder CafePress:
    • “I’m always amazed by how groups and communities can be segmented.” Perhaps more importantly, how they can allow for a diverse selection of views. CafePress is home to the guy who wears the “I heart Halliborton T-shirt” as a parody, and the guy who means it when he wears it.
    • Merchandise happens when issues reach a fevered pitch online. It’s a cross-over to a new form of expression. Think of The Spaghetti Monster virus that spun off many communities and groups.
    • “CGM captures sentiment more accurately than old school media.” More sentiment, yes. Of course, there’s the whole issue of what’s gonna happen to traditional journalism. That said, this gels with the fact that people trust recommendations more if they come from friends.
  • All Mashed Up – The New Web as a Platform Moderator: Adam Hirsch, COO, Mashable Speakers: Paul Buchheit, Co-Founder, FriendFeed, Gannon Hall, CMO, Kyte, Peter Yared, Founder & CEO, iWidgets, Ryan Barrett, Software Engineer and Co-founder of Google App Engine, Google, Inc, Rooly Eliezerov, Co-Founder & President, Gigya, Inc
    • These guys are all about making data and relationships flow across networks. One of the common themes is getting the information to come to you, rather that making you go to get it.
    • What are widgets? “Ten years ago they were functional tools on the desktop. Today the iwidgets are more about self-expression, and they used to increase self-expression.”
    • Three kinds of video content that can be distributed with widget tools across the web 1)UGC branded – companies and customers working together to product content 2) Authentic – from mobile devices 3) Produced – made by companies.
    • Again, FriendFeed is an aggregator of your life-stream. In response to a question about market research, Paul talked about how product/service development in the context of communities have an implicit connection to the market. It’s not about developing a finished product, it’s about making a practice out of design evolution.
  • How to Make a Buck? Monetizing Social Media & UGC Moderator: Ritchie Hecker, Chief Bootstrapper, Bootstrapper.com Speakers: Kevin Yamano, Director of Inventory Management, Clearspring Technologies, Adam Gries, CEO, Social Dynamics, Chris Chinn, VP of Sales, Watercooler, Ashish Dixit, Founder & CTO, Green Patch, Inc.- We’re on the final stretch of two days of User-Generated Content, or Consumer Generated Media, or whatever else you want to call it, and I’m feeling a bit brain dead. So, please bear with me as I pry my eyeballs open for this final presentation. I’ve gotta say, that I think the right conversations are taking place here, it’s just that many of them have taken place several times in the last two days.
    • More on widgets here, how to create them, share them, and use them to tap into ad serving networks. The takeaway: at this point no one is investing to develop these tools specifically for their site when they can tap into excellent third party options that plug into existing platforms.
    • Widgets allow extensive insight into consumer behavior which can help brand market their products, or which can be sold to third parties.
    • This was followed by some debate about privacy of data. Adam said “If the utility benefits outweigh the privacy concerns. then people may accept it and install the application”. In the end, it may be all about perception though, and the reality is that most people don’t realize what kind of data is being pulled out of their iPhones.
    • @jsafir on Twitter hit the event trend hash with: “Porn sites, which monetize well through lead gen, subscription and advertising, are the original success in UGC. Homemade videos…” and yet not one person has talked about this! There have got to be tons of lessons from this industry, which is very UGC oriented.
    • Speaking of, how can we get better at making sure that widgets are serving up relevant ad placements? That’s a challenge that these guys are tackling today.
    • Last interesting point by Adam: one way to monetize content is seen in gifting on Facebook. In this case, the gift receiver must download and install something to view the gift. While this does not represent dollars today, it offsets the cost of distribution. Down the road, greater distribution equals greater monetization.

Ok, that last one was actually quite lively. Whew, that was a ton of UGC dialogue though. I hope this was hopeful to anyone who was unable to attend the event. You can also see the Twitter stream for the event at #ugcx. Thanks for reading, and please keep reading my UGC!

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing, Twitter | Tagged CGM, UGC | Comments (0)

User Generated Content Expo Report Day 1

February 9, 2009 – 6:24 PM

As a fairly new blogger, not counting the blogging I’ve done for clients, I’m excited to be attending the UGCX in San Jose today and tomorrow. If you’re here, please drop me a note to get in touch. Here’s a link to more information about the conference if you don’t already know about it, which is understandable considering this is the first year. You can register at the door, so if you’re in the Bay Area and want to catch day 2 that’s certainly possible.

There are four tracks at the expo including Social Content, Photography, Music, Videos and Gaming. I’ll be focused on the first track but will be checking in on the others for specific speakers. Here’s a quick play-by-play of what I saw today.

  • Keynote: Bruce Livingstone & Kelly Thompson, Founder/CEO & COO of iStockphoto, kicked off the day by talking about how they empowered users to sell their images through istockphoto, and they announced a new audio offering. They claim the system is the only true royalty free stock audio.. In the talk they outlined six key principles from what they’ve learned at iStockphoto.
    • Passion is the glue – A team that is passionate and has complimentary skills. Mold a crowd into a community then get community into the DNA of the organization. Following this, many of the most successful feature sets come from customers within the organization.
    • Innovation is key - You have to keep innovating to stay ahead because the pace of product/service evolution is quick. The shared an example feature they created, which the community didn’t ask for, that completely failed. The feature essentially gave users a temperature rating of how they were perceived by other users (a la Ebay, but visually). Constant innovation means failure.
    • Outsource the crowd – Look for opportunities within your organization to put the crowd to work for you. iStockphoto allowed the crowd to name their new products/services. They use “inspectors” from the community to police new submissions for rights issues.
    • Prepare for scaling - It would be a shame to be successful and then fail because of the inability to scale. Sounds like that almost happened. Make scenario planning a regular practice?
    • The unknown unknowns – In this case they talked about setting up redundancies in their supply chain, namely data centers. Apparently an ice storm took out a telephone pole and brought the site down for a while back in the day.
    • Flexible focus – It’s about being able to move seamlessly from operations, to development, to performance assessment, etc …. which all comes back to customer service.
  • Social Content for Big Business – Laurel Touby, Founder & Senior VP, mediabistro.com, kicked off the day as our moderator. Panelists included: Lane Becker, President, Get Satisfaction, Joe Cothrel, Chief Community Officer, Lithium Technologies, Inc, Marty Collins, Group Marketing Manager, Microsoft,  Matt Warburton, Ex Director of Community Management, Yahoo. I know Lane from my work at Adaptive Path, he was one of the original founders. Get Satisfaction allows “real conversations with company employees and other customers who will answer your questions about the products and services you use”. It’s worth checking out.
    • What is CGM, and what is valuable? According to three panelists there is value in almost all CGM. The real question is about how you get the value out, and to what you apply it to. Lane was somewhat contrarian, stating that it’s not ALL valuable. He also pointed out that the even bigger challenge is, not just how to get the value out, but how to give it back to the consumers who originally created it.
    • CGM does offer an easy way to get insights into potential new products. Lane gave an example from the Timbuk2 community which kept asking for a diaper bag. After sustained community conversation for a year and a half, they finally produced it and it’s become a best selling product. Listen to your customers people. this is just another channel in which to do so.
    • Several panelists talked about using the community to provide product/service development insights and opportunities at low cost. I wonder if there is an issue of self-selection here?
    • Communities inhabit a “space” which can be architected to provide ques about the way to behave. This space can foster community with the right balance of moderation and personality. Enforcement of guidelines is important, but you’ve gotta do it in an appropriate way. Lane quoted Flickr’s guideline and a good example, “Don’t be creepy. You know the guy. Don’t be that guy.”
    • How do you quantify ROI? You can tie ideas back to product development and revenue, you can track leads, if you have a single sign-on you can measure engagement against purchasing behavior, you can count calls you didn’t have to take based on the number of times a community answer has been sourced. Marty talked about a community index report she creates every month. Sounds like a dashboard report, probably a good idea.
    • That said, community managers are getting hurt badly by the economic turn down. Being in marketing still makes you the most likely to get cut first. The advice, get your metrics up to snuff asap, and keep telling emotional stories. There is an advantage in being able to combine the qualitative and quantitative.
  • Video Games: The Real Big Gorilla – Moderator Jonnie Forster, Partner, Forster Bros Speakers: Thain Lyman, Sr. Executive, Activision, Dennis Fong, CEO, Raptr.com. Ryan Okum, President, StreetWise, Matt Connors, Consultant. So I switched over to the video and games track for this to learn about how CGM is working it’s way into this market.
    • It started with Avatars, and profile customization but is rapidly expanding into game customization. For example, there is a new editing suite for Guitar Hero that allows you to create your own tracks.
    • Ryan talked about building private/branded communities through their technology platforms. He spoke about Spider-Man 3 for Activision, which allowed game customization and community participation. His spoke to the importance of blending earned media with media buys. David Armano wrote an interesting post about this topic here. One other point was the importance of owning your own community rather than working with a gaming community provider. StreetWise used to rent their community but now they focus on helping companies develop communities of their own.
    • Based on Dennis’s comments, I’m getting the sense that the real takeaway here is that people who are interested in gaming tend to be highly likely to participate in online communities. He’s providing a platform with Raptr that allows companies to develop communities without having to start from stratch. His big insight was to tie his community into other social networks (i.e. Facebook status updates, tweets, etc about the  game you are currently playing). That’s not too much of a surprise considering the proliferation of mashups.
  • Keynote: Craig Newmark, Customer Service Rep & Founder Craigslist. This was the post-lunch keynote. I have to admit that I got in a bit late because my lunch meeting ran a bit longer than expected. I got there as he was recounting how the Craigslist was used during the Katrina aftermath. He highlighted the importance of getting out of the way of customers. From there, he discussed how the “flagging” system, which is used to report abuse, is dependent on the user community. The Craigslist staff is just there to help. This philosophy is embedded into the organizational DNA, “any user-generated site has to build a culture of trust to be successful.” He went on to explain that trust is only possible if you mix commerce with socializing. From there he raised some interesting questions about how CGM could impact social/governmental issues. One thing that really struck me about Craig is that he’s really good at saying no to opportunities that are not 100% within the brand promise of his service. Like many in the audience, I wonder if he’s not actually too disciplined in this regard because there appears to be so much low-hanging fruit around Craigslist that the mashups can access without back-end data.
  • Beyond the Desktop: Social Content Goes Mobile -Moderator: Adam Hirsch, COO, Mashable Speakers:Philip Miano, National Sales Director, Third Screen Media, Eric Litman, Chairman & CEO, Medialets, Bryan Barletta, Associate Editor, Mediabistro.com, Jonathon Linner, CEO, Limbo.
    • Jonathan started the panel off by talking about mobile trends and the rapid adoption of smart phones.  He asked about how we define the “smart phone”? He hypothesized that it’s more about the users than the phones themselves, and pointed out that more CGM transactions occur through mobile devices than any other channel (though I wonder how he defines CGM based on this …. i.e. does filling out a support request form count?). Jonathan explained that his firm allows developers to embed code into their mobile applications allowing Google Analytic like reporting.
    • Eric then offered some Forrester data that shows that 1 in 4 marketers have explored marketing on mobile devices. “Like talking on the phone, succesfull campaigns are less inturruptive and more conversational.”
    • Bryan talked about an interactive mobile game that takes advantage of GPS capability and that allow users to create treasure hunts. Sounds cool.
    • Jonathan posited that phones are a one-to-one interactions, where computers are more likely to be shared by multiple users. Not sure I agree with this, but what would the implications for design be? For CGM?
    • Various comments about the way mobile CGM will affect citizen journalism.
    • On the whole this panel seemed to lack focus as it bounced from mobile marketing to the adoption process and ultimately projected the  ubiquity of mobile devices. What was missing was an in depth discussion of the mobile eco-system, how social networks will follow us into the mobile context, how CGM is uniquely suited to mobile, or how mobile standards will change the game.
  • Where did you Stick your Video? Video and Viral Marketing Moderator Jay Durgan, Board of Directors, Outhink Media, Inc Speakers:Adam Hirsch, COO, Mashable, Shay David, Founder, Kaltura, Satva Leung, Indi Producer, Joe Oh, Manager, Hub Strategy, Robin Sloan, Online Product Strategist, Current TV
    • Adam jumped in by talking about where to start posting videos …. in short, get them on as many appropriate places as possible, but start with TubeMogul.
    • Robin talked about one of my favorite TV organizations, Current TV, whose catalog is based on user generated content. He was responding to a question about how the content creator gets value for their content. Current has explored many models, but one that I thought was interesting is a program where users can create advertising content for third parties. The key is establishging a clear understanding of monetary expectations up front. Focus on transparency.
    • Joe talked about the importance of metric tracking around video performance online. He notes increasing pressure around metric reporting because viral video no longer seen as a means of driving innovation within marketing departments. It’s now more about wrapping process around the development of content.
    • Satva asked Joe to talk in more detail about the metrics he’s looking for, great question. Joe then explained that the tools for tracking effectiveness of video are not on par with what is available for web pages. This lead to a discussion of the new technologies that are coming down the pipe to get video metrics up to snuff (hover tracking, video notation, in video links, etc). Of course, everyone wants to be able to track videos to conversion rates.
    • Robin wanted to know if anyone is doing A/B testing with video. Sounds like a cool research project.

Ok, that’s it for day one. This is the first time I’ve blogged a conference, so I had no idea how exhausting it would be. I feel like I’ve tapped into the CGM community, but I’m not sure if I’ve heard much that I haven’t already been exposed to online. I have met some interesting people though, and hope to meet more over a drink shortly!

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Tagged CGM, UGC | Comments (1)

Twitter Digest

February 6, 2009 – 4:22 PM

twitterheader2

Can you believe it’s Friday already?
Ok, here’s the weekly twitter summary, and if you’d like to follow me on Twitter you can do so at: http://twitter.com/rsmartx.

  • Autonomous Robots Invade Retail Warehouses – a very cool article at Wired about how Zappos uses robots in their warehouses.
  • Core77 announces the winners of the Green Gadget Design Competition
  • No bike lane, no problem with Light Lane – an amusing interpretation of the bike light
  • Disruptive Innovation, Applied to Healthcare – interesting article in the NY Times
  • A Pill That Navigates – another healthcare innovation article in the NY Times
  • Dan Roam Sketches About How To Fix The Economy – a really great post that I responded to here.

Have a great weekend.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Twitter | Comments (0)

Experience Strategy & Experience Design

February 6, 2009 – 9:59 AM

Yesterday I read a short post from the Design Mind Blog at frog design, it got me thinking about experience design. With the IxDA conference coming up, now seems like a good time to weigh in on the subject. In the frog post, the author mentions giving a talk to Ron Wakkary’s students titled “Experience Design is a Bunch of Horse-Shit“ (click for slides). No matter what your perspective, the post is worth a read. Also, the recent  Interactions Magazine article mentioned in the piece is worth checking out (though you’ll need a subscription to get the whole story).

Here’s my take on experience design and experience strategy. This comes from extensive conversations with the folks at Adaptive Path, most notably  Brandon Schauer, and Jesse James Garrett. Here’ the illustration I created to try and explain how they work together, if you click on the illustration you can see a larger version:

Experience-Strategy-and-Design

What I like about this diagram is that it shows that experience design must work in conjunction with strategy. The two disciplines are shown in a double-helix, like DNA, to remind us that breakthrough experiences put people at the center of the design process. I should also note that strategy is focused on value, while design is focused more on making the engagement compelling.

Jon Kolko’s slide deck includes the following text:

“The assumption that designers control situations leads to self-delusion and also the delusion of clients. Manhattan’s office building plazas – populated by bums, prostitutes, and ambulatory psychotics – are built from architects’ models made credible with the aif of nicely dressed figures sitting still, admiring the fountain and generally making the scale of the building look tolerable. The trouble is that people don’t behave like the cardboard people in architect’s models, because what the cardboard people don’t do is behave.”

I think this is a wonderful point, and I’m in complete agreement. However, I’m not sure that proper experience design works this way because it should be focused on how people would actually act in the enviornment through research, ethnography, and testing. To put it in the parlance of horses (as Jon has), you can provide the horse with the experience of water, but you can’t know exactly if/how he’ll drink it. That said, there is a whole lot you can do with respect to how the horse discovers the water, how it tastes, how much of it there is, and what happens before/during/after the interaction that can improve the experience. The sum of these influences goes beyond the interaction design itself into the realm of experience design in my view.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Design | Tagged user experience | Comments (4)

One Interesting Super Bowl Advertisement

February 5, 2009 – 5:36 PM

I didn’t see  much of note during the Super Bowl this year. I certainly wasn’t surprised to see the job site advertisements considering the financial crisis. I thought the Career Builder and  Monster spots were the most entertaining, for what that’s worth.  I do enjoy a dose of slapstick as much as the next guy though I was quite disappointed by the Facebook Suicide ad, especially considering the way they shut down the Whopper Sacrifice.

That said, I did think ad is less formulaic.

Obviously the conceit of the ad is that they don’t tell you what it’s for. By this, they turn the ad itself into a game of sorts (“G” stands for game?). I found the piece engaging because of the direction, but also because they intentionally presented a wide variety of celebrities. The natural reaction is to try and figure out what they have in common. In this case, they are all athletes.

Beyond that, I think this ad is particularly relevant to the Super Bowl because it is offers a multi-generational viewing experience. By including athletes from several generations, it is possible to start a conversation between generations. There are not many brands doing this successfully. Also, connecting the dots requires that you expand traditional interpretations of sports to include things like dance. Of course, this broadens the audience as well.

“What’s G?” It’s the game, it’s gifted, genius, genuine, gutsy, golden, glorious, a lower case god ….. it’s Gatorade. Normally, it’s a problem if people get to the end of an ad and can’t tell you who it was for. In this case, they’re betting that making people figure it out will actually make it more memorable. I’m curious to see what else they’ll do with the campaign.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Culture, Marketing | Tagged advertising | Comments (0)

Interactive Billboards As A Bridge To Mobile Marketing

February 5, 2009 – 2:37 PM

Before I begin, I am obliged to state that advertising, whether on a billboard, mobile phone, website or printed page, is only one small part of marketing. Sorry, but I’m gonna keep repeating that until people stop asking me if marketing is part of advertising or if advertising is part of marketing. Here’s a short post from Seth Godin that I sometimes send people when they ask. I think it’s pretty funny, and there’s a great clip from Mad Men.

Onto our topic, we know that mobile devices are acting more and more like lenses to the world, and that marketers are trying to figure out how to be relevant in that context. They are also trying to balance the marketing mix for their products/ services and understand how the mobile channel relates to traditional channels. This post contains a collection of links that highlight the bridge that is being build between mobile marketing and traditional advertising (what could be more traditional than a sign/billboard?).

First off, here’s an interesting video of Dan Albritton presenting about Megaphone his mobile billboard company at the Adaptive Path’s UX Conference. You can also see more demos of what they do on their site.

Here’s a recent campaign that involved an interactive game through a large billboard in Times Square. What’s interesting about this is the integration with Facebook. As you can see marketers are looking for ways to connect the mobile experience with other channels, online and otherwise.  Click on the image below to visit their site.

Jumbli

Not long ago, also in Times Square, Nike allowed people to customize a shoe on their billboard through their phones. What is interesting about this case is that it is not done through SMS which generally costs money, and can be carrier dependent (i.e. only AT&T).

nikeidSome other interesting mobile/billboard stuff:

  • During the campaign you could send a message to Sarah Palin (via the Democratic Party) though this interactive billboard.
  • SpectraColor HD billboards also offer WIFI access and more.
  • The largest interactive billboard yet, by Disney.
  • An RFID enabled billboard for Mini Cooper.

The mobile market represents a complex challenge for marketers because of the shifting landscape of technology, device manufacturers, and network carriers. My current take is that most of the campaigns that I’ve seen are pretty much one-offs that don’t offer much value for the customer beyond momentary amusement. It’s still a playground for mega-brands that can afford to pay for a novelty play. In terms of brand awareness, it would work better if the experience was more relevant to the product/service being in question.

I believe this will change fundamentally when the mobile ecosystem, in the US and Europe, starts enabling commerce to take place openly on the mobile platform. And, when I say openly, I don’t mean buying stuff on the internet but buying stuff in the real world. If you’re interested in understanding the landscape better, you might check out Rachel Hinman’s recent essay here. Also, you might want to check out GPS Mission a gps enabled phone game which seems like the next step towards a mobile marketing bridge.

Thanks for reading, and let me know your thoughts about whether or not interactive billboards are a bridge to the mobile platform. Also, if you’ve got other examples, please send them my way.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Culture, Marketing | Tagged advertising, Mobile | Comments (2)

The Case Study Development Process

February 4, 2009 – 6:27 PM

This post is a summary of what I’ve learned over the years about developing case studies. I hope this will serve as a reference, and save some effort, for anyone in the process of telling stories about their work. As I’ve written many times in this blog, telling compelling and engaging stories is one of the central duties of marketing. When it comes to case studies, I think I’m fortunate because I’ve discovered that  I am better at telling real stories than I am at making them up from scratch. Oh well, no great novels for me.

A Word About Format

Case studies can be prepared in a variety of formats, but the process of collecting information should not change significantly. The format, or formats, that you choose to present the stories in should address the needs of the reader you are targeting. Is this for people visiting your website? For a sales presentation? Or, a presentation at a conference? No matter who it’s for, remember that case studies are just another way of making products and services tangible. thereby building credibility and trust. Here is a  list of relevant formats:

  • ABSTRACT – A concise presentation of information that explains what took place. Abstracts are well suited for internal training, bringing new employees up to speed, or refreshing you memory in advance of a presentation.
  • SHORT-FORM – A brief version of the case study that highlights the challenge, intervention, and result. Typically this format focuses on the broad strokes. The short-form might also include your best image or testimonial. These work well in the context of websites, or to present a variety of studies to a client before diving deeper into the most relevant example.
  • LONG-FORM – This is the full blown case study with supporting materials such as testimonials, press coverage, and deliverables. These work well as presentations, and as printed collateral that you can leave with a client. Sometimes. however, you won’t have permission to give away a printed version of the presentation, though you may have the right to incorporate it into a presentation deck during a sales meeting.
  • THUMBNAIL – This is a very brief summary, often just the challenge and results, that serves as a teaser to get people interested in reading more. The thumbnail works well in to context of an online presentation if you have a page of thumbnails organized by industry category.

formats

The Outline

Now that we’ve talked about different formats, let’s talk about the internal structure of the case study itself. Most case studies have a fairly simple and straightforward format. Sometimes the format is highlighted by standard section titles (see examples below) and sometimes, these titles are replace with more colorful phrases that imply which section is about to follow.

  • THE TITLE – The title is very important because it’s the first thing the reader will see. The best titles are descriptive and to the point. Try incorporating the client’s name, their industry, or the  product/service name. I wrote a case study for Adaptive Path about a project they did for MySpace, the title of that was “The Little User Research Project That Changed The Future Of MySpace In A Big Way.
  • THUMBNAIL – If a thumbnail is included in a longer form, then it should follow directly after the title. This is you chance to really set the hook and engage the reader. This is also the point at which most readers will either commit to reading the study, or move on to another one. The best thumbnails are concise, colorful, and inspiring. Here’s the thumbnail from the MySpace case study: As the largest social network in the U.S., with over 76 million users, MySpace’s decision to overhaul all of the major sections of the site could not be taken lightly. Redesigning MySpace demanded a great deal of empathy for a diverse user base and clarification of what makes MySpace unique in the saturated social networking space. The resulting redesign was welcomed by users and shot MySpace to the top of online ad views.
  • ABOUT THE CLIENT – This is the part of the case study where you establish who the client is, what industry they are in, and how they fit into the larger industry. It’s essentially an opportunity to set the scene and establish the backdrop for the rest of the study. This section can end with a statement of the goal of the engagement, which serves as a good transition to the next section. You can see an example of this from a recent case study I developed about PayCycle.
  • THE CHALLENGE – Like the title states, this is about the challenge that your product or service took on. Define a problem, flush out the context in which it arose in greater detail, illuminate any other information that will either affect, or be affected by, your work.
  • WHAT WE DID – Again, very straightforward. What did you do? Walk through the process step by step if necessary, and highlight key moments. This is an important place to also highlight what the client contributed to the solution. A successful case study should not only support your practice, but should support the organization that you’re working with. This will also help immensely when it comes to getting approval for the case study (more on that later).
  • THE RESULTS – This is the most important section, and also the hardest to complete. It’s the most important because it offers the metrics of success that allows potential clients to measure the return on a potential investment in your product or service. It’s the hardest because results take time to measure. It can be hard to convince a client to go through the follow up measurement process once they’ve moved on to other things. Fortunately,  it’s in your mutual interest to do so, which is what you’ll have to explain (again, more on that later).

Because the results is the last section of the case study it’s at the end of the attrition curve for readers. One way to offset this issue is to place some of the results early in the case study in a inset box or column. The visual design and layout can have a huge impact here. Here’s a quick sketch of what a printed long-form might look like. In the context of online case studies there are many ways to manage this issue with interaction design as well.

layout

It Starts With Research

Now that we’ve got an idea of what a case study looks like, where do we start the process of creating one? Before we write anything we need to do some research; like any research, you’ll want to have a structure to work within to make sure you ask the right questions and get a good sample of data. In the past, I’ve created a case study worksheet which I used as a guide to the research process. You can see a list of sample questions you might want to include in your worksheet here.

The design of your worksheet is important because you, and you team, will probably spend a significant amount of time with it. Plus, it can be a helpful asset in the future if you ever want to review the project at a very detailed level. Unfortunately, most people don’t enjoy filling out forms, which is what the worksheet really is … so here are a couple things you can do to deal with this reality:

  • Have your team fill out the worksheet while they do the project, thus completing the task in increments over time.
  • Build the completed worksheets into the end-of-project team review meeting.
  • Make it accessible online (Survey Monkey, Google Forms, BaseCamp, etc) so that it’s available to the whole team, and allow them to collaborate as they fill it out.
  • Use the form as a guide to an in-person interview with the project team.

My experience has been that the success of these techniques depends on the individuals you’re working with and the culture of your organization. As a general rule, the interview approach will almost always work so long as you can find a time to meet. though it’s generally more time consuming for everyone involved (this is one good reason to embed it in the post-project review meeting). As a general rule it should take no more than 3 hours to thoroughly fill out the worksheet and collect the related assets.

Part of the worksheet process includes getting a set of sample deliverables that you can embed into the story. These can be images, quotes from research participants, design assets, or information about a particular practice or method used in the project. Once you’ve got the worksheet complete and an inventory of assets to work with, it’s time to analyze the data.

Analyzing The Data

Since the data is structured, it easy to get a handle on things fairly quickly. This is the time to ask what the story is really about, and how it fits into the larger portfolio of stories you tell. If the story is about a medical device and you already have some great stories in this area, maybe this one should be a short-form or thumbnail. Or, maybe you have a great story in the area but you only have permission to use it in the context of sales meetings. Or, maybe you turn it into a story about a particular design method or practice, such as interaction design?

One good way to evaluate the story is to create a case study matrix for your team. This will help put each story in context, and will also help your team select the most relevant story for the client their talking with. Here’s what such a matrix might look like:

matrix

As you can see, the empty boxes are areas where there are no case studies available. The Y axis shows practice areas, and the X axis shows the industries that you’ve worked in and will sell your products or services to. You’ll obviously want to adjust these to conform to the information architecture you use to qualify your leads. You’ll also probably want some sort of color coding to indicate where you can use these case studies (i.e. internal use only, sales meetings, public). Depending on the size of your firm you might need anywhere from six to eighteen case studies because more involved projects will cover multiple areas of the matrix.

Getting It In Writing

So now you know how your story relates to the case studies you’ve already got, and what the best format should be. In theory, as you work with the matrix you should be able to identify projects that are likely to fill in gaps before they even start. This is important because it allows you to get into the project early and set expectations with your internal team, and with the client. It’s great if the sales team is also involved so that they can take this into account as they sell. If there’s a project that can complete the matrix, it might be consistent with the larger business strategy to make some sacrifices to win the project. This is particularly relevant if you’re trying to bring your products and services into new industries or markets where you have not worked before.

When this is the case, you’ll want to make sure that you’ve got clear language in your contract that will allow you to talk about the project. This is a significant challenge, particularly when you’re working with large companies, so be prepared to negotiate. Also, go into the process understanding that it’s probably not worth blowing the deal, and that your chances of getting what you want might only be 50%.

  • THE CONTRACT – You’ll probably want to consult your lawyer but the goal is to get some language into the contract that says that you can talk about the project, list the client on your website, get a testimonial, represent a deliverable, etc. They probably won’t agree to anything that doesn’t require their approval, but you can use language that states that they must be “reasonable” with respect to the approve process, and turn around time. Also, make sure that they’re on board with the commitment to share follow up project data with you, or your results section will be weak.
  • THE SACRIFICES – Depending on what your product or service is, you may be able to provide an incentive for your clients to allow you to create a case study with discounts, offers to submit the work to competitions, faster turn around time, participation of senior staff, etc.
  • THE EARLY START – If you’re working on a project that you think has significant potential as a case study, get in early and connect with the most senior person you can. Communicate that case studies are essential to your business, that as clients they relied on a case study in their decision to work with you, and talk about how it can provide value for them as well.

And Finally, Writing It

Here’s a good formula to follow:

  1. Start by writing the project abstract.
  2. Get approval from the project team that it’s an accurate representation of the project.
  3. Send the abstract to the client and tell them that this will be the basis for a case study. Explain that this version is for internal use only.
  4. Once you have approval, try your hand at the thumbnail. I recommend this because it’s a great way of setting the tone of the case study. I find it’s helpful to have someone of the project team check in on your progress as you go.
  5. With an solid thumbnail, outline the format you’ve decided to go with. If you’re doing both a short and long-form version, I recommend starting with the short-form, and then expanding it into the long-form later.
  6. This is a good time to check back in with the internal team and any other stakeholders.
  7. Assuming all is well, it’s time to bring in a copy-editor to clean it up.
  8. With the copy edited version in hand, it’s time to get approval from the client. Embedding the copy in a rich visual presentation may be more compelling, but you might also end up having to make a significant number of edits …. just something to be aware of.
  9. Once you have approval, it’s time to turn it over to a designer for each of the presentation formats you’re working with.

I have been asked whether it makes more sense to have a copywriter manage the whole process, or if it makes more sense to write it yourself and then work with a copy editor. The short answer is that it depends on how your organization is set up. The main thing is that one person manages the process from start to finish.

I hope this is helpful, and I look forward to any feedback and comments on how to improve these guidelines.

By Roland Smart | Posted in Marketing | Tagged Case Study | Comments (4)
« Older posts
Newer posts »
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.8)