• Categories


    • Culture
    • Design
    • Marketing
    • Podcast
    • Twitter


  • Projects


    • About
    • Contact
    • E-Mail Subscription
    • ROOM Installation
    • Art Show Down
    • MUSES Book
    • France Book
    • Love Drug


  • Tags


    advertising art Blogging brand branding Case Study CGM cloud CRM customer satisfaction Design Engagement Applications Facebook health humor identity Marketing 2.0 Mobile MySpace OpenID phtography Product Design promotion prototype psychology public relations research roadmap sales SEM SEO social media social network Social Networking strategy Sustainability touchpoints Twitter UGC user experience viral visualization web web design WordPress


  • Archives


    • August 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008


« Previous
Next »

Facebook Failed The Whopper Sacrifice

It’s been one day since I wrote about The Whopper Freakout, when I learned about The Whopper Sacrifice. And, I have to hand it to the folks at the advertising agency Crispin Porter + Bogusky for serving up another brilliant campaign.

Here’s the gist of it:

You cancel 10 friendships on Facebook and you get a free Whopper.

Absolutely brilliant, a critique of what “friendship” means in the context of the social network, and provocative. I’m pretty sure everyone in this scenario was a winner. Regrettably Facebook failed it by shutting down the Whopper Sacrifice Application after 233,906 friendships were canceled. Michael Arrington deserves credit for highlighting the fact that shutting Burger King down when you’re trying to find ways to monotize your service is not wise.

I believe Burger King put it best when they wrote this on the shut-down microsite:

Facebook fails it

Facebook fails it

This entry was written by Roland Smart, posted on January 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, filed under Culture, Marketing and tagged advertising, viral. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
« Previous
Next »

2 Comments

  1. Mollybob
    Posted January 15, 2009 at 1:53 PM | Permalink

    What about from Facebook’s perspective on this. Will reducing the size of people’s networks benefit them? How does reducing the size of networks relate to future income? Perhaps they thought they were protecting their network. With this thing going viral they most likely thought they were stopping further damage to their network. You’re right, the campaign was very clever and showed the power of things going viral, but it was also destructive.

  2. admin
    Posted January 15, 2009 at 2:04 PM | Permalink

    Good question. My feeling is that most people on Facebook have a large percentage of contacts that are not actually friends and do not add value to the service. Therefore, this campaign has the added benefit of weeding out folks that aren’t really bringing value to your account. Plus, don’t forget you could always add them back later if you change your mind. On the whole 250,000 friends, even 2.5 million friends is a drop in the Facebook bucket. Facebook should protect me from weeding out my own account, or engaging in a transaction with another service of my choice …. I don’t think so. I actually think that a “weeded” account offers more value for Facebook to sell. There is a potential problem that arises if you try and scale though because people will simply start churning friends to take advantage of promotions. On the other hand, if their friends are willing to put up with it, I say let the market decide.

3 Trackbacks

  1. By Smart Method Blog › Fry Innovation @ Burger King on January 15, 2009 at 5:27 PM

    [...] on a Burger King binge here …. but I have to write one last post. In my over exuberance for their recent campaign I went out to grab a Whopper for lunch even though I am very much against fast food, and avoid it [...]

  2. By Smart Method Blog » One Interesting Super Bowl Advertisement on February 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM

    [...] I didn’t see  much of note during the Super Bowl this year. I certainly wasn’t surprised to see the job site advertisements considering the financial crisis. I thought the Career Builder and  Monster spots were the most entertaining, for what that’s worth.  I do enjoy a dose of slapstick as much as the next guy though I was quite disappointed by the Facebook Suicide ad, especially considering the way they shut down the Whopper Sacrifice. [...]

  3. By Facebook hates us « Uncooked on December 15, 2009 at 5:08 AM

    [...] means no more Whopper Sacrifice! (Reminder of how Facebook fecked that up.) Or the brilliant IKEA Facebook tagging competition by Forsman & Bodenfors over in Sweden. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.8)